The president of the Cop28 climate talks has blamed rich nations’ “dismal” failure to provide US$100 billion a year in climate finance to developing countries for “holding up” progress in negotiations.
The UAE’s climate envoy Sultan Al Jaber has requested donor countries to provide a definitive assessment on the overdue delivery of the commitment before the climate summit in Dubai at the end of November.
“Expectations are very high. Trust is very low,” he told attendees of the Petersberg Climate Dialogues in Berlin.
In 2009 wealthy nations committed to collectively mobilise $100bn a year by 2020 to help developing countries cut their emissions and adapt to climate impacts.
But they have so far failed to respect that pledge. In 2020 rich nations mobilised $83.3 billion of climate finance, according to data published last year by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
At the annual Petersberg Climate Dialogues in Berlin, Al-Jaber contrasted rich countries’ failure to provide US$100bn of climate finance with this year’s US$100bn in military expenditure and pledges for the war in Ukraine and the US$9,000bn that were mobilised to respond to Covid-19.
Speaking before Al-Jaber, German foreign minister Annalena Baerbock said that a meeting of rich countries in Berlin suggested they are “on a good track to finally make good on the promise” this year.
A plan drawn up by Germany and Canada ahead of Cop26 in 2021 indicated that the pledge would be met this year, three years later than the original deadline.
For Jule Könneke, a policy advisor at E3G, meeting the pledge is one of the keys to changing course at Cop28.
“For donor countries, it is about proving to be a credible partner by delivering on commitments and ensuring that poorer countries have the means to meet climate and development goals,” she said.
The bulk of the climate finance gap can be attributed to just a handful of developed countries, according to analysis by the Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
The United States shoulders the biggest responsibility providing only five percent of its “fair share” under a calculation done by the ODI that includes the size of its economy and historical emissions.
The U.S should have provided US$43bn but sent just US$2bn, the ODI said, making it “overwhelmingly responsibile for the climate finance gap.
Australia, Canada, Italy and Spain have also been singled out as laggards.
Underlying several times the importance of “trust” Sultan Al Jaber said meeting this obligation is “vital” to the political credibility of the UN’s climate process.
Alpha Kaloga from the Africa Group of Negotiators told Climate Home the delay has been eroding trust. “Which credibility do developed countries have in requesting us for more climate action, while not providing the resources promised,” he asked.
Sarah Colenbrander, climate programme leader at ODI, is critical of Al Jaber’s statements. She told Climate Home that Al-Jaber should work with the biggest donors, like France, Germany and Japan, to raise ambition rather than sowing division.
“There are also important questions to be asked about when newly wealthy countries should assume responsibility for providing climate finance,” said Colebrander. “The Cop28 presidency is shirking such questions.”
Countries like the Cop28 host United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Singapore have per capita incomes that exceed those of some developed nations obliged to provide climate finance.
Fourteen years after its inception, the US$100 billion pledge may not even be enough for developing nations.
Avantika Goswami from the Delhi-based Centre for Science and Environment told Climate Home it is “more of a symbol” at this point. “Meeting the pledge this year might assuage wealthy countries’ guilt, but the needs have now escalated and so must the financial reparations”, she added.
Developing countries may need up to one trillion dollars every year for climate action, according to an estimate by the Cop27 and 26 hosts. That’s ten times more than US$100 billion.
Developing and vulnerable countries also want to see more grants and lower interest rates on loans so that climate finance does not add to debt piles.
SOURCE: CLIMATE HOME/PACNEWS