- News Feature : Surviving in the market space [10/07/2020 - Fiji]
- Sports News : 14 more sports accredited in Fiji [10/07/2020 - Fiji]
- News Feature : Protecting the human rights of migrants in the Pacific essential in COVID-19 recovery process, UN agencies say [10/07/2020 - Fiji]
- Business News : Hopes for a Pacific travel bubble fading [10/07/2020 - Fiji]
- Business News : From relief to Recovery: PNG's economy in the time of COVID-19 [10/07/2020 - Papua New Guinea]
- News : COVID-19: Fiji records additional five border control cases [10/07/2020 - Fiji]
- News : Fiji's ratification of the nuclear treaty calls for new clear ways [10/07/2020 - Fiji]
- News : "It's going to happen again," says former New Zealand PM Clark tasked with WHO COVID-19 review [10/07/2020 - New Zealand]
- News : Tearful WHO director calls for global unity to fight the virus following U.S. pullout [10/07/2020 - Switzerland]
- News : Tahiti may host meeting to elect new PIF head [10/07/2020 - French Polynesia]
- News : Trachoma intervention reaches 8024 Nauruans [10/07/2020 - Nauru]
- News Feature : Pacific Climate Change study gains $4.5million [10/07/2020 - New Zealand]
- Sponsored : Oceania National Olympic Committees (ONOC)
In the wake of the recent Marshall Islands Supreme Court ruling declaring a Nitijela (parliament) law banning postal ballots unconstitutional, a battle has brewed among elected leaders and lawsuit plaintiffs over what should happen for next month’s national election, scheduled for 18 November.
The president’s office announced that as a result of the court ruling, “The November election will proceed as planned, based on the current law and with existing restrictions on postal ballots.”
A group of opposition Nitijela senators demand publicly this week “that the government exert all efforts to ensure that our citizens outside the Republic are given the opportunity to participate in this election and cast their votes.”
Lawsuit plaintiffs questioned, “does the Cabinet have the will, the desire for all to vote?” Anna Anien and Evelyn Konou, who filed one of the two lawsuits challenging Public Law 2016-28 that banned voting by postal absentee voting, and Biram Stege said they met with President Hilda Heine to seek action for postal voting next month.
But, they said, “So far — and we hope there is a change of heart — government has demonstrated no willingness to support widespread postal ballot use for off-island voters.” They said there is no question the Electoral Office “is capable” to manage postal voting.
“The government must accept the ruling and cooperate immediately by agreeing to conduct this year’s election using pre-Bill No. 6 (Public Law 2016-28), established voting law that provides postal ballots,” said Anien, Konou and Stege.“We reminded the president that the universal suffrage clause of our Constitution means that all Marshallese voters must be able to cast their ballots in the upcoming November election and asked for her cooperation to make it happen.”
But the president’s office said: “The Supreme Court has clearly found that there is no constitutional right to a postal ballot or any other specific measure of voting for qualified voters residing overseas.” The president’s office is maintaining the status quo of no postal voting for next month.
Meanwhile, opposition senators said a coalition of independent senators attempted on several occasions to revoke Nitijela Bill No. 06 but all attempts were blocked by the president, her cabinet and the ruling party.
They described the statement issued by the government after the court ruling as “another deception by the president and her cabinet to place a smoke screen over the failure of the government to accord citizens of the Marshall Islands residing overseas their constitutional right to participate in the upcoming election.”
The Supreme Court ruling said there was no constitutional requirement for the government to provide voting through postal absentee ballots. But, it ruled, given the clear language in the constitution providing for universal suffrage, the government is required to provide some means of voting for the tens of thousands of citizens living in the United States. Because of the short time from the ruling last week to the 18 November national election, the court said its decision was effective after the November election because it placed an unreasonable burden on government to roll out a voting option for off-shore voters in the five weeks to the election.
SOURCE: MARIANAS VARIETY/PACNEWS
Pacific Islands News Association
Who & What is PINA?
International News Safety Institute (INSI)
Media Helping Media