- Sports News : Lawyers called in as rift grows in Oceania weightlifting [06/05/2021 - Australia]
- News : New candidates barred from second Samoan poll, fresh election tantamount to a coup [06/05/2021 - Samoa]
- News Feature : Asia-Pacific Fishery Commission convenes amid COVID-19’s continued menace to world’s fisheries hub [06/05/2021 - Thailand]
- Business News : Fiji's new Covid outbreak pops ‘bula bubble’ [06/05/2021 - Fiji]
- Business News : ADB launches plan for Pacific to boost urban services and livability [06/05/2021 - Philippines]
- News : PNG 2022 General election dates set [06/05/2021 - Papua New Guinea]
- News : FAST Party challenges Samoa Head of State’s call for fresh elections [06/05/2021 - Samoa]
- News : Samoa Chief Justice confirms election petitions will proceed [06/05/2021 - Samoa]
- News : New Zealand rejects call to review Samoa election [06/05/2021 - Samoa]
- News : Senior lawyer accuses Samoa Head of State of hijacking People’s Constitutional rights [06/05/2021 - Samoa]
- News : Fiji records third death of coronavirus [06/05/2021 - Fiji]
- News : Four new COVID-19 cases in Fiji; Lautoka hospital on complete lockdown [06/05/2021 - Fiji]
- Sponsored : Oceania National Olympic Committees (ONOC)
Australia now has the lowest levels of influence and authority in the south Pacific since the mid-1980s, despite out-investing China in the region at a rate of more than four to one, a top international relations expert says.
Cold war attitudes and empty climate promises from Australia have pushed south Pacific leaders towards China, says Professor Michael Wesley.
The University of Melbourne deputy vice-chancellor says if Australia is concerned about Beijing's motives and activities, the Pacific Step-Up focused on countering China with infrastructure and security spending is not going to sway hearts and minds, and instead should focus on training people.
In a new paper for the Canberra-based think tank China Matters about what Australia should do in response to Chinese government activities in the south Pacific, Professor Wesley argues Australia must aim towards creating a "broad cadre of Australian alumni" across governments in the region.
“You don't get much gratitude from infrastructure - you get ongoing gratitude from deep engagement in building human capabilities, human possibilities,” Professor Wesley told The Canberra Times.
Between 2010 and 2018 China promised to spend almost as much as Australia in regional aid investment, but spent just $1.76 billion (US$1.36 billion) compared with Australia's $8.77 billion (US$6.80 billion). Despite this disparity, the Pacific Step-Up "will not achieve its objective of forestalling growing PRC influence in the south Pacific," he said.
Let China build bridges and roads, he said, as that was also good for the Pacific, and Australia and New Zealand could spend money on other needs with more influence.
“One of the things that many south Pacific countries are struggling with is governance capacity, the ability to draw on a cadre of well-trained public servants who are able to work systematically to build capacity across all fields of governance,” Professor Wesley said.
To assist with this, Australia needed to be bringing in significant numbers of people to study at secondary, vocational and university level, he said.
He urged the government to develop a comprehensive package that includes training young people and officials in their own country using online transnational education methods.
Australia's Foreign Affairs department and Public Service Commission do fund international programs in the region “to improve their public sector leadership and governance”. A current job advertisement for the programme says officials will be required to travel for the programme once international borders reopen in 2022.
Pressing the potential threat from China was not effective at building influence, Professor Wesley warned.
“Most Pacific Island leaders refuse to buy in to claims from Australia - as well as New Zealand and the U.S - that the PRC's growing role represents a threat to the region,” he wrote in the paper.
“Many are justly wary of Cold War manoeuvring as a prelude to neo-colonial interventions: in the words of the Samoan Prime Minister, 'we are again seeing invasion and interest in the form of strategic manipulation'.”
Canberra's challenge, he argues, is that it is “increasingly isolated” in the Pacific Island Forum despite being a member and its main funder, as the body has seen increasing levels of solidarity around concern for climate change, on which Australia is seen as “passive”.
Pacific nations have concerns about China's hostility to Christianity, Professor Wesley said, but far less concerned about forced labour of ethnic Uighurs and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang, about which Australia has raised “grave concerns”.
The paper recommends Australia join the South Pacific Tourism Organisation, and review its "restrictive" visa policies on Pacific Islanders' travel to Australia, “which continue to create ill will”.
Australia should also drop mention of PRC concerns from its Pacific Islands policy, the paper states, and instead be ready to help Pacific Island countries “pragmatically deal” with a wider set of international partners, including China.
If Australia did not want to see expanded Chinese maritime bases in the South Pacific, it could change the discussion to maintaining a military-free region - including no bases owned by Australia or the United States.
“Once you allow these sort of maritime presences, it becomes a competitive process and the region becomes drawn into a Cold War-like set of rivalries,” Professor Wesley said.
The paper comes after Home Affairs secretary Mike Pezzullo said that Australia must prepare for regional conflict in a message to staff for Anzac Day, declaring the global "drums of war" were beating.
The paper urged changes to Australia's Pacific approach to be less controlling of the islander nations, including:
*Australia should drop mention of PRC concerns from its Pacific Islands policy. It should be ready, if asked, to help build the capacities of Pacific Island countries to deal pragmatically with a more diverse set of international partners - including the PRC.
*Australia should engage genuinely with the security framing and imperatives of the Boe Declaration. This will mean taking more determined action on climate change and signalling the phasing out of fossil fuel production and exports. It must also work in partnership to promote key aspects of the Declaration - solidarity, resilience and the assertion of the interests of Pacific Island countries.
*Australia should build on its existing advantages in the South Pacific - the longevity of its involvement, the popular goodwill towards Australians and the legacy of broad Australia-Pacific Islands links.
*Australia should review its restrictive visa policies on Pacific Islanders' travel to Australia, which continue to create ill will. It should retain and expand the Pacific Labour Mobility scheme.
*Canberra should consider investing more heavily in education and skills development in the South Pacific, aiming to create a broad cadre of Australian alumni into the future.
*Australia should continue to support Pacific Island countries in addressing the health, social and economic costs of the COVID-19 pandemic. It should help to reinvigorate the tourism industry in the region by joining the South Pacific Tourism Organisation.
*Australia should also pledge to provide surplus vaccines directly to Pacific Island countries and to provide logistics capabilities to support the vaccine rollout there, potentially through the Australian Defence Force (ADF) or ADF Reserves.
SOURCE: CANBERRA TIMES/PACNEWS
Pacific Islands News Association
Who & What is PINA?
International News Safety Institute (INSI)
Media Helping Media