- News Feature : Frequently asked questions on climate change and disaster displacement [01/01/2020 - Morocco]
- News : Victory [25/06/2019 - Fiji]
- Sports News : Tonga in need of sponsorship to continue playing in Oceania League Cup [24/06/2019 - Tonga]
- Sports News : Australia boosts Samoa's ability to provide Games security [24/06/2019 - Samoa]
- Business News : New Lady Naomi in the makings [24/06/2019 - Fiji]
- News : Solomon Opposition calls on government to provide report on China trip [24/06/2019 - Solomon Islands]
- News : Prime Minister’s taskforce on China heads to Vanuatu [24/06/2019 - Vanuatu]
- News : Tonga receives new Guardian-class Patrol Boat [24/06/2019 - Australia]
- News Feature : Are there climate change refugees in the Pacific? [24/06/2019 - Australia]
- Business News : Pacific Skills Summit to initiate a new jobs pool [24/06/2019 - Fiji]
- Business News : Fiji faces major milk shortage [24/06/2019 - Fiji]
- Business News : Samoa tourism revenues continues to soar [24/06/2019 - Samoa]
- Sponsored : Oceania National Olympic Committees (ONOC)
UN Environment published an unusually stark critique of carbon offsetting on Monday.
On Tuesday, the article was taken down, following queries by Climate Home News.
In the original article, archived by the Wayback Machine, a climate specialist at the UN organisation warned against considering carbon offsets as “our get-out-jail-free card”.
“The era of carbon offsets is drawing to a close,” Niklas Hagelberg wrote. “Buying carbon credits in exchange for a clean conscience while you carry on flying, buying diesel cars and powering your home with fossil fuels is no longer acceptable or widely accepted.”
Since 2008, UN Environment has claimed to be climate neutral, based on buying carbon credits from a scheme administered by UN Climate Change. While not indicating any change to that policy, the commentary appeared to attack the underlying concept of polluters paying others to cut emissions on their behalf.
Contacted by Climate Home News, Hagelberg blamed the editing process for introducing some “conflicting messages” to his original text and said a revised version would be published shortly. “This is a web story not an official position paper. However [UN Environment] does see offsets as an intermediate solution.”
At time of publication, spokespersons at UN Environment and UN Climate Change had not responded to requests for comment.
At issue is a system set up under the Kyoto Protocol to allow rich countries to gain carbon credits by investing in emission reduction projects in the developing world. UN Climate Change has since repurposed it as a voluntary mechanism for businesses, organisations and individuals to offset some of their carbon footprint.
Last August, UN Climate Change came under fire for releasing a video promoting carbon offsets as an easy remedy to climate change. Entitled “keep calm and offset”, the advertisement appeared to suggest that viewers could lead a carbon-heavy lifestyle as long as they offset their emissions. It was taken down after a backlash.
Carbon offsets have long been a controversial proposition to tackle the climate crisis. At the last UN climate summit in December, negotiators were unable to reach consensus on whether and how to continue Kyoto-era offset schemes under the Paris Agreement. Talks resume in Bonn, Germany this month.
In parallel, the International Civil Aviation Organization is considering what types of carbon credits can be used by airlines to offset their emissions growth.
Transport & Environment, a Brussels-based campaign group for cleaner transport, urged UN Environment to restore the article “in the interest of effective climate policy”.
“With the aviation sector targeting offsetting as its get-out-of-jail-card for climate action, this piece threw some necessary cold water on what is an extremely problematic climate tool,” said campaigner Andrew Murphy.
SOURCE: CLIMATE HOME/PACNEWS
Pacific Islands News Association
Who & What is PINA?
International News Safety Institute (INSI)
Media Helping Media